Hi Laurence,
I am following up again as it has now been five days since you said you had sent me a DM and would assist further. We have still not received a substantive resolution.
I appreciate that personal account details should be handled privately, but I think it is important to put the scale of the issue on record.
My father is 90 years old and is also dealing with a serious advanced illness. He clearly did not understand the number of AVG subscriptions he was accumulating.
Our review of his AVG account found at least:
-
14 paid AVG orders
-
Approximately 19 paid product subscriptions/licences within those orders
-
At least 9 subscriptions showing 0 devices in use when we reviewed the account
-
5 paid purchases of AVG Internet Security
-
4 Driver Updater purchases, including 3 separate purchases on the same day — 14 March 2026
-
3 BreachGuard purchases, all on 14 March 2026
-
Approximately 4 TuneUp / PC TuneUp purchases
-
Repeated overlapping purchases of Secure Browser and other AVG products
One particularly clear example is AVG Internet Security. My father already had AVG Internet Security, then bought it again as part of a package in March 2026, bought another copy on 2 June 2026, and then bought yet another copy on 12 June 2026.
This is not simply a customer asking to cancel one subscription outside the normal refund period. It is the account of a 90-year-old customer who repeatedly accumulated concurrent and redundant AVG products, while numerous paid subscriptions were showing no device usage at all.
We have therefore asked AVG to review the historical activation and device-use records and exercise discretion regarding refunds for unused, duplicate and overlapping subscriptions.
We are not claiming that “0 devices” necessarily proves that every one of those licences was never used historically - that is precisely why we are asking AVG to check its own activation records.
Given my father’s age, health circumstances and the extraordinary subscription history visible in AVG’s own records, we are asking AVG to handle this graciously and as a vulnerable-customer case, rather than simply applying the standard refund window mechanically.
I can provide evidence of his age and circumstances privately if genuinely required, but I do not believe sensitive personal or medical documentation should have to be posted publicly in order to obtain a substantive response.
Could you please confirm publicly that this has now been referred to an appropriate person for review, and arrange for a substantive written response privately?
Thank you.